Kamala Harris, the former attorney general of California, will not say if she voted for or against increased penalties for crime and drug offenses.
We already posted her former views on not wanting to prosecute for drug dealers until the third offense to give you an idea of where she stands. That is why she won’t tell you what it is. Just look at her lawlessness as Vice President with open borders and funding domestic terrorists.
Here’s her fake excuse where she refuses to take a stand on crime:
Harris dodges if she voted for CA’s prop 36–a measure to up crime/drug penalties.
“I am not gonna talk about the vote on that because, honestly, it’s the Sunday before the election and I don’t intend to create an endorsement one way or the other”
pic.twitter.com/00AHqRIt0K— Alex Thompson (@AlexThomp) November 3, 2024
Alex Thompson is an Axios and CNN contributor who has been trying to get answers from her, but she doesn’t give answers.
New: Harris is the “no comment” candidate — purposely and strategically—calculating it’s safer to be vague on some policies than hit as a flip-flopper or left-winger.
We asked about over 12 of her past stances the past 2 months.
The no comment list:https://t.co/AeYlbC1YUf pic.twitter.com/Icu5aDf3rG
— Alex Thompson (@AlexThomp) November 3, 2024
Harris’s Plan for Drug Dealers
“DA Kamala Harris floated a plan to the police department to not prosecute drug dealers until their third arrest. … The police command, hearing about this, said, This is crazy. AC Transit, Bart, and Sam Trans will have to add extra buses and trains to transport all the drug dealers.
“One said, Captain Cashman said, I believe in catch and release for trout, but not for drug dealers, and it’s just what you said. Word travels on the street. So drug dealers hear about this, and they flock to San Francisco, and there’s a connection between that kind of rampant drug dealer and turf wars and homicides. That’s why that article troubles me so much.
Subscribe to the Daily Newsletter
wpDiscuz
